VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

GPT-5.5 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash RL

8 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 8 shared benchmarks, GPT-5.5 scores higher on 1 and MiMo V2.6 Flash RL on 7. The widest gap is Program Bench, where GPT-5.5 scores 70.8 against 26. MiMo V2.6 Flash RL is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.14 against $5.00 per million input tokens).

OPENAIVSXIAOMI8 SHARED17 HEAD-TO-HEADNEWEST SCORE ADDED

At a glance

MakerOpenAIXiaomi
Released
Price per 1M tokens input / output$5.00 / $30.00$0.14 / $0.28
Cost of 1M in + 1M out$35.00$0.42 83.3× less
Head-to-head of 8 shared benchmarks1 wins7 wins
Scores tracked independently verified208 399 0

Release dates: Artificial Analysis for GPT-5.5; the Hugging Face repository date for MiMo V2.6 Flash RL. Prices: Artificial Analysis for GPT-5.5; deepinfra for MiMo V2.6 Flash RL. ◆ = independently verified score.

Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins

AreaGPT-5.5WINSMiMo V2.6 Flash RL
Coding01MiMo V2.6 Flash RL leads 1 of 1 · widest: Terminal-Bench 2.1 79.4 vs 87.6
Agentic01MiMo V2.6 Flash RL leads 1 of 1

Biggest gaps

GPT-5.5 pulls furthest ahead on

No ratified-area lead of 3 points or more.

MiMo V2.6 Flash RL pulls furthest ahead on

  1. Terminal-Bench 2.187.6 vs 79.4

Every shared benchmark8 · grouped by area

Coding 1

Agentic 1

Other shared benchmarks 6

Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, deepinfra), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.

Compare GPT-5.5 withALL PAIRINGS →