Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Every number traces back.

Ten ratified manifestos define what counts: 64 benchmarks in the baskets, 0 retired for saturation or contamination. Every score wears one of five provenance marks — and below, today's reasoning leader is followed from source to rank.

10 manifestos·64 basket benchmarks·0 retired·Ratified 2026-Q3Provenance on every row
The life of a numberA live row — today's reasoning leader's top-weighted basket entry, traced end to end
Source → published rank · refetched on every loadNothing publishes unsourced
SourceAA graded harnessAggregator attested
Canonical rowcritpt · 31.7raw score · /100 · GPT-6 Astra
Weight28%of the Reasoning basket
Composite93.2 · /100reliability-weighted percentile
Published#1 on ReasoningOpen the board →
Below-threshold confidence never reaches this wire — it routes to review, not publication. Missing data prints an em-dash, never a guess.
The ladderFive provenance marks — the same ◆ every score wears across the terminal
IVIndependently verified

A third party ran the model.

Replicable from the harness's published prompts and scoring code. The strongest mark a score can wear.

HELM · LiveBench · SWE-Bench Verified · LMArena evals
AAAggregator attested

An aggregator surfaced the score.

Model card, leaderboard table, registry entry — a neutral party re-attesting a primary source.

Hugging Face · Papers with Code · model registries
VAVendor attributed

The maker's own number.

System card, model card, launch post. Authoritative on the model — not independently replicated.

OpenAI system cards · Anthropic model cards · vendor blogs
CRVendor cross-reference

A vendor re-states a rival's number.

Launch-post comparison tables, a blog quoting a competitor's eval. Kept, attributed — and never the headline.

Demoted below first-party attribution when the headline score is selected
SASource attributed

Extracted from prose, not re-run.

Research papers, conference talks, technical briefs. Surfaced with its source — the lowest rung, worn openly.

arXiv papers · conference talks · community evals
The pipelineFive stages, source poll → published board · runs without human hands
01

Ingest

200+ sources poll on schedule — leaderboards, system cards, audited harnesses, papers.

Sources register on first detection
02

Canonicalize

Aliases collapse onto one canonical model and one canonical benchmark; most-recent wins at the database layer.

One row of truth per (model, benchmark)
03

Score

Per-axis manifestos define the basket. Composites are reliability-weighted percentiles, shrunk toward the median for thin samples.

Two bases, toggleable everywhere
04

Verify

Every score carries its provenance mark; within-model disagreement surfaces as a band, never averaged away.

Low confidence → review, not publication
05

Publish

The boards render straight from the scored view — no editorial overlay between the data and the page.

Provenance + reference URL on every row
The basketsWhat each axis composites · weights ratified per quarter · retirements owned openly
Tier 1 — Established axesHigh coverage, audited harnesses, narrow confidence.

Reasoning

Tier 1 · 2026-Q3

Ranked on critpt, HLE, ARC-AGI-2/3, GPQA Diamond, SimpleBench and LiveBench reasoning (2026-Q3 v2, ratified 2026-08-23). Weights follow measured frontier separation, construct centrality and field recognition; no saturated benchmark ranks.

critpt28%
HLE27%
ARC-AGI-215%
GPQA Diamond10%
simplebench10%
livebench_reasoning10%
+ 1 more in the basket
Ratified Aug 23, 2026

Coding

Tier 1 · 2026-Q3

Ranked on the SWE-bench family, LiveBench agentic coding + coding, Terminal-Bench Hard + 2.1, scicode, LiveCodeBench v6 and the webdev arena (2026-Q3 v3, AA Coding Index removed 2026-09-19 after AA withdrew it; replaced 1:1 by Terminal-Bench Hard).

livebench_agentic_coding18%
Terminal-Bench Hard11%
SWE-bench Pro10%
livebench_coding10%
scicode10%
SWE-bench Verified9%
+ 4 more in the basket
Ratified Aug 23, 2026

Agentic

Tier 1 · 2026-Q3

Ranked on TauBench V3, OSWorld-Verified, MCP Atlas, GDPval, Terminal-Bench 4.0, BrowseComp and analystAgent (2026-Q3 v4). apexAgents/itbenchSre moved to DEPTH — too thin (33 models) to rank the newest launches; Terminal-Bench 4.0 (115 models incl. GPT-6 Astra, 27 vendors) added as the broad agentic-execution leg — operator Option A, 2026-09-20.

TauBench V3 - Banking19%
OSWorld-Verified16%
MCP Atlas16%
terminalbenchV4015%
gdpval14%
browsecomp10%
+ 3 more in the basket
Ratified Aug 23, 2026

Safety

Tier 1 · 2026-Q3

Scale's SEAL safety boards (MASK honesty, Fortress adversarial risk, PropensityBench misuse propensity) now flow daily — 46 models measured on two or more. The cross-vendor safety ranking is parked pending calibration research; board scores appear on each model's page, labeled, with direction stated (Fortress and PropensityBench count risk — lower is better).

Ratified Aug 23, 2026
Tier 2 — Emerging axesSufficient signal to rank; bands wider where coverage thins.

Long Context

Tier 2 · 2026-Q3

Ranked on MRCR v2, AA-LCR and LongBench v2 (2026-Q3 v2.1, coverage pass 2026-08-23). No living universal long-context board exists beyond AA's; card depth carries the rest.

mrcr_v2_8needle_128k_average40%
AA-LCR35%
longbench_v225%
Ratified Aug 23, 2026

Math

Tier 2 · 2026-Q3

Ranked on FrontierMath Tier 4 and Tiers 1-3 v2, MathArena BrokenArXiv and ArxivMath (newest live monthly cut) and LiveBench Mathematics (2026-Q3 v2.7, 2026-09-10). Every ranked entry currently scores newly released models. MathArena's cross-month "overall" boards are tracked as depth rather than ranked: they only score a model that has been run on every live monthly cut, and print N/A for four current flagships including GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5. The competition boards — AIME 2026, HMMT Feb 2026, IMO-AnswerBench, Apex 2025, USAMO 2026 — are tracked as depth: they are no longer re-run on new launches, and AIME is saturated at the frontier (every measured top-25 model scores 95+). Depth entries stay visible on model pages and re-promote if a board resumes.

frontiermath_tier_430%
brokenarxiv_2026_0629%
arxivmath_2026_0619%
frontiermath_tiers_1_3_v212%
livebench_math10%
arxivmath_overall0%
+ 11 more in the basket
Ratified Aug 23, 2026

Multimodal

Tier 2 · 2026-Q3

Ranked on MMMU-Pro, OCRBench, Video-MME, MMMU, CharXiv (reasoning) and MathVista (2026-Q3 v2.3, ratified 2026-09-08). MMMU and MMMU-Pro are ONE suite — they agree on 97.6% of ranked pairs, so the pair is capped at 0.30 of the axis rather than counted twice. OCRBench is admitted as the most independent entry measured (text-in-image). BLINK, MMStar, OCRBench v2 and the vision arena stay tracked as depth, visible on model pages but not ranked.

Video-MME21%
OCRBench21%
MMMU17%
charxiv_rq15%
MMMU-Pro13%
MathVista13%
+ 4 more in the basket
Ratified Aug 23, 2026

Multilingual

Tier 2 · 2026-Q3

Scale's MultiNRC multilingual board now flows (36 models, 8 vendors — French, Spanish and Chinese). A single-board three-language ranking is parked pending research; multilingual scores appear on model pages. Re-opens with a broader source or the research pass.

Ratified Aug 23, 2026

Factuality

Tier 2 · 2026-Q3

Ranked on AA-Omniscience (accuracy + non-hallucination), SimpleQA Verified and Vectara HHEM (2026-Q3 v2, ratified 2026-08-23). Third-party day-0 coverage is AA's alone; new launches reach eligibility as Epoch and Vectara publish.

simpleqa_verified39%
vectara_hallucination_rate21%
OmniScience Accuracy20%
OmniScience Non-Hallucination20%
Ratified Aug 23, 2026
Tier 3 — Provisional axesSmall basket or volatile field; treat as directional.

Instruction Following

Tier 3 · 2026-Q3

Ranked on LiveBench instruction following, MultiChallenge, IFBench and Multi-IF (2026-Q3 v2.1, coverage pass 2026-08-23).

livebench_instruction_following40%
IFBench35%
multichallenge25%
multi_if0%
Ratified Aug 23, 2026
Manifestos: agent-drafted, founder-ratified, revisited each quarter · deprecations listed with reasons in every manifesto← The frontier board
Which pages we publishSelection rules, not permutations

785 models carry a permalink on Vector Wire, which is 307,720 possible pairings. Our sitemap submits 1,770 of them — 0.58% — the 60 most-benchmarked models crossed pairwise, and nothing else.

  • ComparisonsSubmitted only for the 60 models carrying the most tracked benchmarks, crossed pairwise. A submitted comparison is withheld from indexing when the two models share fewer than 10 comparable benchmarks — below that there is not enough overlap to compare, and we would rather publish nothing than pad a table.
  • Benchmark boardsA leaderboard is published once at least 5 published models carry a comparable default-variant score on it. Internal and scaffold evaluations are excluded outright. Every board we publish is listed here.
  • Model pagesOne page per published model. No variants, no per-benchmark permutations, no per-vendor duplicates of the same model.

That ratio describes the URLs we submit for indexing. The comparison route itself answers any two tracked models, and a model page links the comparisons most relevant to that model whether or not the pair is submitted — a reader following a link is never sent to a dead end. What is deliberately bounded is what we ask a search engine to index.