Arctic Instruct is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 8 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Facts rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Every test, side by side
All 8 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
FactsArctic Instruct
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is betterArctic Instruct by 3.14.37.4+3.1
Other results7 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- MATHGemma 3 27B by 37.151.989+37.1
- vectara_answer_rateGemma 3 27B by 36.162.798.8+36.1
- MMLUGemma 3 27B by 19.457.576.9+19.4
- GSM8KGemma 3 27B by 19.176.895.9+19.1
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthGemma 3 27B by 1581.496.4+15
- vectara_factual_consistencyArctic Instruct by 3.195.792.6+3.1
- AA Intelligencetie5.44.9tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Arctic Instruct or Gemma 3 27B?
Arctic Instruct wins the one area where both have results: facts. Gemma 3 27B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 8 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 1 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.