Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02.05

Anthropic · released

Wins 0 of 2 areas

—

Google · released

Wins 1 of 2 areas

Reasoning

Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02.05 wins more areas, narrowly.

Scores updated · 14 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Coding rests on a single test.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet$3.00 to read · $15.00 to write$18Price from Artificial Analysis
Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02.05No current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02.05 pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+6.2points aheadGemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02.0562.2Claude 3.5 Sonnet56
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+3points aheadGemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02.056.2Claude 3.5 Sonnet3.2

Where Claude 3.5 Sonnet pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 14 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingEven

Full coding ranking

ReasoningGemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02.05

Full reasoning ranking

Other results11 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02.05?

Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp 02.05 wins one of the two areas where both have results: reasoning. Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins none. They are level on coding.

Which is better for coding?

Neither. All 1 coding tests both models report are ties.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 14 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 3 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.