Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Fable 5 vs Claude Mythos 5.1

Anthropic · released

Wins 0 of 2 areas

—

Anthropic · released

Wins 2 of 2 areas

Coding · Reasoning

Claude Mythos 5.1 is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Fable 5$10.00 to read · $50.00 to write$60Price from Anthropic's own price page
Claude Mythos 5.1$10.00 to read · $50.00 to write$60Price from Anthropic's own price page

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Claude Mythos 5.1 pulls ahead

  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+5.4points aheadClaude Mythos 5.160.9Claude Fable 555.5
  • Fixes real GitHub issues in many programming languagesSWE-bench Multilingual+2.5points aheadClaude Mythos 5.189.1Claude Fable 586.6
  • Long, multi-file coding tasks in real codebasesSWE-bench Pro+1.2points aheadClaude Mythos 5.181.2Claude Fable 580

Where Claude Fable 5 pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingClaude Mythos 5.1

Full coding ranking

ReasoningClaude Mythos 5.1

Full reasoning ranking

Other results11 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1Claude Mythos 5.1 by 27.924.752.6+27.9
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Claude Mythos 5.1 by 16.444.560.9+16.4
  • GDPval-AA v2Claude Mythos 5.1 by 130 rating points17231853+130 rating
  • OSWorld 2.0 (strict)Claude Mythos 5.1 by 5.636.141.7+5.6
  • OSWorld 2.0 (partial)Claude Mythos 5.1 by 572.977.9+5
  • HealthBench ProfessionalClaude Fable 5 by 3.96662.1+3.9
  • DeepSWE 1.1Claude Fable 5 by 2.67067.4+2.6
  • Program BenchClaude Mythos 5.1 by 1.386.387.6+1.3
  • HLE (with tools)Claude Mythos 5.1 by 1.263.865+1.2
  • ARC-AGI-1Claude Fable 5 by 198.597.5+1
  • SWE-bench Multimodaltie54.154.7tie

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Claude Mythos 5.1?

Claude Mythos 5.1 wins all two areas where both have results: coding and reasoning. Claude Fable 5 wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Claude Mythos 5.1. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude Fable 5 wins none.

Which is cheaper?

Claude Fable 5 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; Claude Mythos 5.1 costs $10.00 and $50.00. For a million tokens read plus a million written, they cost about the same.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 11 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.