The two are evenly matched.
Scores updated · 6 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 6 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Images and chartsEven
Other results3 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- LiveCodeBenchClaude Opus 4.5 by 38.38748.7+38.3
- AIME 2025Claude Opus 4.5 by 20.992.871.9+20.9
- MATH-VisionClaude Opus 4.5 by 13.677.163.5+13.6
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or GLM-4.6V (106B-A12B)?
Neither wins more tests than the other in any of the one area where both have results.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 6 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 3 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.