Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.1 Instant

Anthropic · released

Wins 2 of 4 areas

Coding · Following instructions

OpenAI

Wins 2 of 4 areas

Reasoning · Images and charts

The two are evenly matched.Claude Opus 4.5 is better at coding and following instructions; GPT-5.1 Instant at reasoning and images and charts.

Scores updated · 6 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the four areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Coding, reasoning, images and charts and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Opus 4.5$5.00 to read · $25.00 to write$30Price from Anthropic's own price page
GPT-5.1 InstantNo current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Claude Opus 4.5 pulls ahead

  • Keeps track of context across a multi-turn chatMulti-Challenge+7.8points aheadClaude Opus 4.559GPT-5.1 Instant51.2
  • Fixes real GitHub issues in Python projectsSWE-bench Verified+4.6points aheadClaude Opus 4.580.9GPT-5.1 Instant76.3

Where GPT-5.1 Instant pulls ahead

  • College exam questions with charts, maps and diagramsMMMU+4.7points aheadGPT-5.1 Instant85.4Claude Opus 4.580.7
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+1.5points aheadGPT-5.1 Instant88.1Claude Opus 4.586.6

Every test, side by side

All 6 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingClaude Opus 4.5

Full coding ranking

ReasoningGPT-5.1 Instant

Full reasoning ranking

Images and chartsGPT-5.1 Instant
  • MMMUGPT-5.1 Instant by 4.780.785.4+4.7

Full images and charts ranking

Following instructionsClaude Opus 4.5

Full following instructions ranking

Other results2 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.1 Instant?

Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-5.1 Instant each win two of the four areas where both have results. Claude Opus 4.5 wins coding and following instructions; GPT-5.1 Instant wins reasoning and images and charts.

Which is better for coding?

Claude Opus 4.5. It wins the one coding test both models report.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 6 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.