VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC
Refresh Models Deals Regulatory Sources

Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo V2.6 Flash RL

9 SHARED BENCHMARKS

Across 9 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on 3 and MiMo V2.6 Flash RL on 6. The widest gap is Program Bench, where Claude Opus 4.8 scores 71.9 against 26. MiMo V2.6 Flash RL is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.14 against $5.00 per million input tokens).

ANTHROPICVSXIAOMI9 SHARED36 HEAD-TO-HEADNEWEST SCORE ADDED

At a glance

MakerAnthropicXiaomi
Released
Price per 1M tokens input / output$5.00 / $25.00$0.14 / $0.28
Cost of 1M in + 1M out$30.00$0.42 71.4× less
Head-to-head of 9 shared benchmarks3 wins6 wins
Scores tracked independently verified213 329 0

Release dates: Artificial Analysis for Claude Opus 4.8; the Hugging Face repository date for MiMo V2.6 Flash RL. Prices: Anthropic's own price page for Claude Opus 4.8; deepinfra for MiMo V2.6 Flash RL. ◆ = independently verified score.

Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins

AreaClaude Opus 4.8WINSMiMo V2.6 Flash RL
Coding01MiMo V2.6 Flash RL leads 1 of 1
Agentic10Claude Opus 4.8 leads 1 of 1

Every shared benchmark9 · grouped by area

Other shared benchmarks 7

CyberGym78.895.1
JobBench48.461.2
Terminal-Bench 4.023.628.8

Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (anthropic-official, deepinfra), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 withALL PAIRINGS →