Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

DeepSeek-V2 vs Kimi K2 Base

DeepSeek · released

Wins 0 of 1 area

—

Moonshot · released

Wins 1 of 1 area

Reasoning

Kimi K2 Base is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 24 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Reasoning rests on a single test.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Kimi K2 Base pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+12.8points aheadKimi K2 Base48.1DeepSeek-V235.3

Where DeepSeek-V2 pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 24 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

ReasoningKimi K2 Base

Full reasoning ranking

Other results23 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, DeepSeek-V2 or Kimi K2 Base?

Kimi K2 Base wins the one area where both have results: reasoning. DeepSeek-V2 wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 24 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 1 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 23 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.