Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B wins more areas, narrowly.
Scores updated · 6 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Coding rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+3.8points ahead
Where Gemma 3 27B pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 6 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
ReasoningQwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- GPQA DiamondQwen2.5 Instruct 32B by 3.842.846.6+3.8
- Humanity's Last Examtie4.44tie
Other results3 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- BBHGemma 3 27B by 3.187.684.5+3.1
- AA IntelligenceQwen2.5 Instruct 32B by 24.96.9+2
- BIG-Bench Extra HardGemma 3 27B by 1.819.317.5+1.8
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B?
Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B wins one of the two areas where both have results: reasoning. Gemma 3 27B wins none. They are level on coding.
Which is better for coding?
Neither. All 1 coding tests both models report are ties.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 6 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 3 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.