Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Gemma 3 4B vs Granite 4.0 H Tiny

Google · released

Wins 2 of 3 areas

Reasoning · Following instructions

IBM · released

Wins 1 of 3 areas

Coding

Gemma 3 4B is the stronger all-rounder.Granite 4.0 H Tiny is better at coding.

Scores updated · 13 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the three areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Coding, reasoning and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Gemma 3 4B$0.05 to read · $0.10 to write$0.15Price from deepinfra
Granite 4.0 H TinyNo current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Gemma 3 4B pulls ahead

  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+9.9points aheadGemma 3 4B28.3Granite 4.0 H Tiny18.4
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+2.6points aheadGemma 3 4B29.1Granite 4.0 H Tiny26.5

Where Granite 4.0 H Tiny pulls ahead

  • Recent programming contest problemsLiveCodeBench v6+7.8points aheadGranite 4.0 H Tiny26.7Gemma 3 4B18.9

Every test, side by side

All 13 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingGranite 4.0 H Tiny

Full coding ranking

ReasoningGemma 3 4B

Full reasoning ranking

Following instructionsGemma 3 4B
  • IFBenchGemma 3 4B by 9.928.318.4+9.9

Full following instructions ranking

Other results10 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • MATH-500 (EM)Gemma 3 4B by 1573.258.2+15
  • MGSMGemma 3 4B by 13.687.373.7+13.6
  • MMLU-ProGemma 3 4B by 11.643.632+11.6
  • HumanEval+Granite 4.0 H Tiny by 1162.873.8+11
  • GSMPlusGemma 3 4B by 9.368.459.1+9.3
  • IFEvalGemma 3 4B by 9.190.281.1+9.1
  • MMLUGranite 4.0 H Tiny by 8.458.466.8+8.4
  • LCB v5Granite 4.0 H Tiny by 8.219.127.3+8.2
  • GSM8KGemma 3 4B by 6.689.282.6+6.6
  • MMMLUGranite 4.0 H Tiny by 650.156.1+6

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gemma 3 4B or Granite 4.0 H Tiny?

Gemma 3 4B wins two of the three areas where both have results: reasoning and following instructions. Granite 4.0 H Tiny wins coding.

Which is better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Tiny. It wins the one coding test both models report.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 13 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 3 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 10 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.