Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Gemma 4 E2B vs InternVL3.5-1B

Google · released

Wins 1 of 1 area

Images and charts

OpenGVLab

Wins 0 of 1 area

—

Gemma 4 E2B is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 7 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Gemma 4 E2B pulls ahead

  • Reads text in imagesOCRBench+38.4points aheadGemma 4 E2B71.9InternVL3.5-1B33.5
  • Visual perception tasks people solve at a glanceBLINK+1points aheadGemma 4 E2B45.2InternVL3.5-1B44.2

Where InternVL3.5-1B pulls ahead

  • Questions that truly need the image to answerMMStar+5points aheadInternVL3.5-1B50.3Gemma 4 E2B45.3

Every test, side by side

All 7 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

Images and chartsGemma 4 E2B
  • OCRBenchGemma 4 E2B by 38.471.933.5+38.4
  • MMStarInternVL3.5-1B by 545.350.3+5
  • BLINKGemma 4 E2B by 145.244.2+1

Full images and charts ranking

Other results4 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Gemma 4 E2B or InternVL3.5-1B?

Gemma 4 E2B wins the one area where both have results: images and charts. InternVL3.5-1B wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 7 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 3 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.