The two are evenly matched.
Scores updated · 9 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Reasoning rests on a single test.
Every test, side by side
All 9 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Other results8 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- HumanEvalQwen2 7B Instruct by 42.737.279.9+42.7
- C-EvalQwen2 7B Instruct by 33.643.677.2+33.6
- EvalPlusQwen2 7B Instruct by 30.739.670.3+30.7
- MultiPL-EQwen2 7B Instruct by 29.429.759.1+29.4
- GSM8KQwen2 7B Instruct by 26.455.982.3+26.4
- MBPPQwen2 7B Instruct by 16.650.667.2+16.6
- MMLU-ProQwen2 7B Instruct by 10.433.744.1+10.4
- Theorem QAQwen2 7B Instruct by 3.821.525.3+3.8
Questions people ask
Which is better, Gemma (7B) or Qwen2 7B Instruct?
Neither wins more tests than the other in any of the one area where both have results.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 9 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 1 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 8 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.