Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

GLM-4.6V-Flash (9B) vs InternVL-3.5 (8B)

Z.ai · released

Wins 1 of 1 area

Images and charts

OpenGVLab · released

Wins 0 of 1 area

—

GLM-4.6V-Flash (9B) is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

GLM-4.6V-Flash (9B)$0.30 to read · $0.90 to write$1.20Price from novita
InternVL-3.5 (8B)No current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where GLM-4.6V-Flash (9B) pulls ahead

  • Visual perception tasks people solve at a glanceBLINK+9.5points aheadGLM-4.6V-Flash (9B)64.9InternVL-3.5 (8B)55.4
  • Math problems shown in pictures and chartsMathVista+6.1points aheadGLM-4.6V-Flash (9B)82.8InternVL-3.5 (8B)76.8
  • Questions that truly need the image to answerMMStar+4.5points aheadGLM-4.6V-Flash (9B)74.3InternVL-3.5 (8B)69.8

Where InternVL-3.5 (8B) pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

Images and chartsGLM-4.6V-Flash (9B)
  • BLINKGLM-4.6V-Flash (9B) by 9.564.955.4+9.5
  • MathVistaGLM-4.6V-Flash (9B) by 6.182.876.8+6.1
  • MMStarGLM-4.6V-Flash (9B) by 4.574.369.8+4.5
  • OCRBenchGLM-4.6V-Flash (9B) by 2.38683.7+2.3
  • MMMUtie71.271.7tie

Full images and charts ranking

Other results10 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, GLM-4.6V-Flash (9B) or InternVL-3.5 (8B)?

GLM-4.6V-Flash (9B) wins the one area where both have results: images and charts. InternVL-3.5 (8B) wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 5 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 10 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.