Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Granite 4.0 H 1B vs Qwen3 1.7B (instruct)

IBM · released

Wins 1 of 2 areas

Following instructions

Alibaba

Wins 1 of 2 areas

Reasoning

The two are evenly matched.Granite 4.0 H 1B is better at following instructions; Qwen3 1.7B (instruct) at reasoning.

Scores updated · 7 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Reasoning and following instructions rest on a single test each.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Granite 4.0 H 1B pulls ahead

  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+4.9points aheadGranite 4.0 H 1B26.2Qwen3 1.7B (instruct)21.3

Where Qwen3 1.7B (instruct) pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+8.6points aheadQwen3 1.7B (instruct)34.9Granite 4.0 H 1B26.3

Every test, side by side

All 7 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

ReasoningQwen3 1.7B (instruct)

Full reasoning ranking

Following instructionsGranite 4.0 H 1B
  • IFBenchGranite 4.0 H 1B by 4.926.221.3+4.9

Full following instructions ranking

Other results5 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • GSM8KGranite 4.0 H 1B by 35.969.633.7+35.9
  • MATH-500 (EM)Qwen3 1.7B (instruct) by 23.247.270.4+23.2
  • MMLU-ProQwen3 1.7B (instruct) by 15.327.642.9+15.3
  • IFEvalGranite 4.0 H 1B by 6.480.173.7+6.4
  • BFCL v3Granite 4.0 H 1B by 4.450.746.3+4.4

Questions people ask

Which is better, Granite 4.0 H 1B or Qwen3 1.7B (instruct)?

Granite 4.0 H 1B and Qwen3 1.7B (instruct) each win one of the two areas where both have results. Granite 4.0 H 1B wins following instructions; Qwen3 1.7B (instruct) wins reasoning.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 7 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 2 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 5 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.