Step3 VL 10B is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Step3 VL 10B pulls ahead
Where InternVL-3.5 (8B) pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Images and chartsStep3 VL 10B
Other results10 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- HumanEval-VStep3 VL 10B by 41.824.366+41.8
- ScreenSpot-Pro (No tools)Step3 VL 10B by 36.215.451.5+36.2
- OSWorld-GStep3 VL 10B by 27.131.959+27.1
- MATH-VisionStep3 VL 10B by 18.75270.8+18.7
- ReMIStep3 VL 10B by 14.652.667.3+14.6
- All-Angles-BenchStep3 VL 10B by 11.945.357.2+11.9
- PhyXStep3 VL 10B by 950.559.5+9
- ScreenSpot-V2Step3 VL 10B by 8.68492.6+8.6
- AI2DStep3 VL 10B by 7.182.389.3+7.1
- MMBench (EN)Step3 VL 10B by 4.288.292.4+4.2
Questions people ask
Which is better, InternVL-3.5 (8B) or Step3 VL 10B?
Step3 VL 10B wins the one area where both have results: images and charts. InternVL-3.5 (8B) wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 5 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 10 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.