Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

LFM2-350M vs Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking

Liquid AI · released

Wins 0 of 2 areas

—

Alibaba · released

Wins 2 of 2 areas

Reasoning · Following instructions

Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 8 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Reasoning and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

LFM2-350MNo current price is tracked.
Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking$0.20 to read · $2.40 to write$2.60Price from Artificial Analysis

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+43.2points aheadQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking70.7LFM2-350M27.5
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+34.3points aheadQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking50.7LFM2-350M16.4

Where LFM2-350M pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 8 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

ReasoningQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking
  • GPQA DiamondQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking by 43.227.570.7+43.2

Full reasoning ranking

Following instructionsQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking
  • IFBenchQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking by 34.316.450.7+34.3

Full following instructions ranking

Other results6 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • MMLU-ProQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking by 62.619.381.9+62.6
  • τ²-Bench (Retail)Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking by 50.55.656.1+50.5
  • BFCL v3Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking by 50.422.973.4+50.4
  • BFCLv4Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking by 38.212.350.5+38.2
  • τ²-BenchQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking by 38.210.849+38.2
  • IFEvalQwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking by 25.765.190.8+25.7

Questions people ask

Which is better, LFM2-350M or Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking?

Qwen3 30B A3B 2507 Thinking wins all two areas where both have results: reasoning and following instructions. LFM2-350M wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 8 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 2 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 6 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.