LFM2-VL-1.6B is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 11 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where LFM2-VL-1.6B pulls ahead
Where LFM2-VL-450M pulls ahead
- Reads text in imagesOCRBench+30.6points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 11 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Images and chartsLFM2-VL-1.6B
Other results7 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- MMVet (Pass@1)LFM2-VL-1.6B by 13.947.833.9+13.9
- InfoVQA (val)LFM2-VL-1.6B by 13.858.444.6+13.8
- RealWorldQALFM2-VL-1.6B by 13.865.852+13.8
- MM-IFEvalLFM2-VL-1.6B by 13.346.433.1+13.3
- MMLULFM2-VL-1.6B by 10.85140.2+10.8
- SEEDBench_IMGLFM2-VL-1.6B by 8.47263.6+8.4
- MMMU (val) (Pass@1)LFM2-VL-1.6B by 5.339.734.4+5.3
Questions people ask
Which is better, LFM2-VL-1.6B or LFM2-VL-450M?
LFM2-VL-1.6B wins the one area where both have results: images and charts. LFM2-VL-450M wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 11 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.