Qwen3.5 2B is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 12 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Reasoning rests on a single test.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3.5 2B pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+22.5points ahead
- Reads text in imagesOCRBench+20.4points ahead
- Questions that truly need the image to answerMMStar+14.2points ahead
Where LFM2-VL-450M pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 12 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Images and chartsQwen3.5 2B
Other results7 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- MMLU-ProQwen3.5 2B by 49.317.266.5+49.3
- MM-IFEvalQwen3.5 2B by 22.333.155.4+22.3
- IFEvalQwen3.5 2B by 21.851.873.6+21.8
- MMMBQwen3.5 2B by 20.254.374.5+20.2
- RealWorldQAQwen3.5 2B by 13.15265.1+13.1
- MMMU (val) (Pass@1)Qwen3.5 2B by 9.734.444.1+9.7
- POPEQwen3.5 2B by 4.883.888.6+4.8
Questions people ask
Which is better, LFM2-VL-450M or Qwen3.5 2B?
Qwen3.5 2B wins all two areas where both have results: reasoning and images and charts. LFM2-VL-450M wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 12 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 5 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.