Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Llama 3 (70B) vs Qwen2 72B

Meta

Wins 0 of 1 area

—

Alibaba

Wins 1 of 1 area

Reasoning

Qwen2 72B is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 17 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Reasoning rests on a single test.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Qwen2 72B pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+1.6points aheadQwen2 72B37.9Llama 3 (70B)36.3

Where Llama 3 (70B) pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 17 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

ReasoningQwen2 72B

Full reasoning ranking

Other results16 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Llama 3 (70B) or Qwen2 72B?

Qwen2 72B wins the one area where both have results: reasoning. Llama 3 (70B) wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 17 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 1 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 16 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.