Llama 3 (70B) is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 9 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Reasoning rests on a single test.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Llama 3 (70B) pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+11points ahead
Where Qwen2 7B Instruct pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 9 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Other results8 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- HumanEvalQwen2 7B Instruct by 31.748.279.9+31.7
- EvalPlusQwen2 7B Instruct by 15.554.870.3+15.5
- MultiPL-EQwen2 7B Instruct by 12.846.359.1+12.8
- C-EvalQwen2 7B Instruct by 1265.277.2+12
- MMLU-ProLlama 3 (70B) by 8.752.844.1+8.7
- Theorem QALlama 3 (70B) by 732.325.3+7
- MBPPLlama 3 (70B) by 3.270.467.2+3.2
- GSM8KQwen2 7B Instruct by 1.880.582.3+1.8
Questions people ask
Which is better, Llama 3 (70B) or Qwen2 7B Instruct?
Llama 3 (70B) wins the one area where both have results: reasoning. Qwen2 7B Instruct wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 9 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 1 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 8 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.