Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B vs Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct
Wins 2 of 2 areas
Coding · Reasoning
Wins 0 of 2 areas
—
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B is the stronger all-rounder.Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is cheaper.
Scores updated · 12 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs 78% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B pulls ahead
- Fixes real GitHub issues in Python projectsSWE-bench Verified+44.7points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+38.3points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+17.3points ahead
Where Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 12 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- SWE-bench VerifiedNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by 44.753.79+44.7
- SciCodeNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by 9.136.227.1+9.1
ReasoningNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B
- GPQA DiamondNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by 38.38041.7+38.3
- Humanity's Last ExamNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by 17.320.83.5+17.3
Other results8 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- LiveCodeBenchNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by 49.881.231.4+49.8
- MMLU-ProNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by 33.383.750.4+33.3
- ARC-ChallengeNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by 25.696.170.5+25.6
- HumanEvalQwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct by 12.280.592.7+12.2
- MBPPQwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct by 8.581.790.2+8.5
- AA IntelligenceNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by 6.112.86.7+6.1
- HellaSwagNemotron 3 Super 120B A12B by 68983+6
- WinoGrandeQwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct by 1.978.980.8+1.9
Questions people ask
Which is better, Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B or Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B wins all two areas where both have results: coding and reasoning. Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins none, but costs 78% less.
Which is better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct wins none.
Which is cheaper?
Nemotron 3 Super 120B A12B costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.06 and $0.20. That makes Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B Instruct about 78% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 12 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 8 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.