Qwen3.5 4B is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 5 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3.5 4B pulls ahead
- Reads text in imagesOCRBench+13points ahead
Where Phi 4 R V 15B pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 5 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Images and chartsQwen3.5 4B
Other results2 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- DocVQA-valQwen3.5 4B by 18.676.294.8+18.6
- TextVQA-valQwen3.5 4B by 5.176.181.2+5.1
Questions people ask
Which is better, Phi 4 R V 15B or Qwen3.5 4B?
Qwen3.5 4B wins the one area where both have results: images and charts. Phi 4 R V 15B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 5 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 3 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.