Qwen3 235B A22B is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 8 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Reasoning rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Qwen3 235B A22B pulls ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+1.1points ahead
Where Phi 4 Reasoning Plus pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 8 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Other results7 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- LiveCodeBenchQwen3 235B A22B by 17.653.170.7+17.6
- Arena HardQwen3 235B A22B by 16.67995.6+16.6
- HMMT Feb. 2025Qwen3 235B A22B by 15.846.762.5+15.8
- MMLU-ProPhi 4 Reasoning Plus by 7.87668.2+7.8
- AIME 2024Qwen3 235B A22B by 4.481.385.7+4.4
- AIME 2025Qwen3 235B A22B by 3.57881.5+3.5
- IFEvalPhi 4 Reasoning Plus by 1.784.983.2+1.7
Questions people ask
Which is better, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus or Qwen3 235B A22B?
Qwen3 235B A22B wins the one area where both have results: reasoning. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 8 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 1 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 7 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.