A.X-K2 vs Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Wins 4 of 5 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Long documents
Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 15 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking03Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha3 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha2 of 2 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own12Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha2 of 3 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha1 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents rests on a single test.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha pulls ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+28points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+14.9points ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+6.2points ahead
Where A.X-K2 pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+55.1points ahead
- Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+3.7points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 15 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 283967+28
- SciCodeAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 1.94142.9+1.9
AgentsAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha
- GDPValAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 6.223.229.4+6.2
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingA.X-K2 by 3.716.112.4+3.7
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 303+3
ReasoningAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha
- Humanity's Last ExamAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 429.633.6+4
- CritPtAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 28.910.9+2
- GPQA DiamondAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 1.985.787.6+1.9
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationA.X-K2 by 55.16711.9+55.1
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 14.918.633.5+14.9
Long documentsAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha
- AA-LCRAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 5.77075.7+5.7
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 2038.858.8+20
- AA-OmniscienceA.X-K2 by 16.9-8.2-25.1+16.9
- AA IntelligenceAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 5.321.526.8+5.3
- AA Agentic IndexAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 3.725.729.4+3.7
Questions people ask
Which is better, A.X-K2 or Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha?
Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning and long documents. A.X-K2 wins none. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; A.X-K2 wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 15 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.