Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

A.X-K2 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)

SK Telecom · released

Wins 0 of 5 areas

—

Anthropic · released

Wins 4 of 5 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Long documents

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 10 tests both models report · How we compare

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

A.X-K2No current price is tracked.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)$2.00 to read · $10.00 to write$12Price from Artificial Analysis

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) pulls ahead

  • Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+27.7points aheadClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)46.3A.X-K218.6
  • Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+10.7points aheadClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)33.9A.X-K223.2
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+8.1points aheadClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)49.1A.X-K241

Where A.X-K2 pulls ahead

Every test, side by side

All 10 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
  • SciCodeClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 8.14149.1+8.1

Full coding ranking

AgentsClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 20.7020.7+20.7
  • GDPValClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 10.723.233.9+10.7

Full agents ranking

ReasoningClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
  • Humanity's Last ExamClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 6.629.636.2+6.6
  • CritPtClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 2.58.911.4+2.5

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Long documentsClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
  • AA-LCRClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 67076+6

Full long documents ranking

Other results2 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • AA-OmniscienceClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 27.6-8.219.4+27.6
  • AA IntelligenceClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 14.421.535.9+14.4

Questions people ask

Which is better, A.X-K2 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning and long documents. A.X-K2 wins none. They are level on facts.

Which is better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback). It wins the one coding test both models report.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 10 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 8 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.