Motif-3-Beta wins more areas, narrowly.Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha is better at long documents.
Scores updated · 14 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software02Motif-3-Beta2 of 2 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own01Motif-3-Beta1 of 2 tests · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha1 of 1 test
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking11Even1 each · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents rests on a single test.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Motif-3-Beta pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+39points ahead
- Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+16.5points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+6.8points ahead
Where Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha pulls ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+12.5points ahead
- Research-level physics problemsCritPt+4.9points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+1points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 14 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingMotif-3-Beta
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Motif-3-Beta by 3.86770.8+3.8
- SciCodeMotif-3-Beta by 1.442.944.3+1.4
AgentsMotif-3-Beta
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingMotif-3-Beta by 16.512.428.9+16.5
- GDPValtie29.430.3tie
ReasoningEven
- Humanity's Last ExamMotif-3-Beta by 6.833.640.4+6.8
- CritPtAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 4.910.96+4.9
- GPQA Diamondtie87.686.9tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationMotif-3-Beta by 3911.950.9+39
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 12.533.521+12.5
Long documentsAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha
- AA-LCRAgnes 2.5 Pro Alpha by 175.774.7+1
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceMotif-3-Beta by 7.3-25.1-17.8+7.3
- AA Agentic IndexMotif-3-Beta by 5.529.434.9+5.5
- AA IntelligenceMotif-3-Beta by 5.526.832.3+5.5
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexMotif-3-Beta by 3.258.862+3.2
Questions people ask
Which is better, Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha or Motif-3-Beta?
Motif-3-Beta wins two of the five areas where both have results: coding and agents. Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha wins long documents. They are level on reasoning and facts.
Which is better for coding?
Motif-3-Beta. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Agnes 2.5 Pro Alpha wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 14 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.