Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta vs Motif-3-Beta
Wins 3 of 5 areas
Agents · Reasoning · Long documents
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 14 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own20Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta2 of 2 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking21Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta2 of 3 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta1 of 1 test
- CodingWriting and fixing software11Even1 each
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents rests on a single test.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+16.3points ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+10.3points ahead
- Research-level physics problemsCritPt+9.7points ahead
Where Motif-3-Beta pulls ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+4.2points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+2.9points ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+1.1points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 14 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingEven
- SciCodeAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 4.548.844.3+4.5
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Motif-3-Beta by 1.169.770.8+1.1
AgentsAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta
- GDPValAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 10.340.630.3+10.3
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 6.835.728.9+6.8
ReasoningAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta
- CritPtAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 9.715.76+9.7
- GPQA DiamondAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 3.690.586.9+3.6
- Humanity's Last ExamMotif-3-Beta by 2.937.540.4+2.9
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 16.367.250.9+16.3
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyMotif-3-Beta by 4.216.821+4.2
Long documentsAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta
- AA-LCRAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 8.38374.7+8.3
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA Agentic IndexAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 8.943.834.9+8.9
- AA-OmniscienceAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 7.3-10.5-17.8+7.3
- AA IntelligenceAgnes 2.5 Pro Beta by 2.935.232.3+2.9
- Artificial Analysis Coding Indextie62.362tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta or Motif-3-Beta?
Agnes 2.5 Pro Beta wins three of the five areas where both have results: agents, reasoning and long documents. Motif-3-Beta wins none. They are level on coding and facts.
Which is better for coding?
Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 2 both models report.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 14 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.