Agnes 3.0 Flash vs Celeris-1
Wins 5 of 5 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Agnes 3.0 Flash is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 13 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own30Agnes 3.0 Flash3 of 3 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Agnes 3.0 Flash3 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Agnes 3.0 Flash2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up20Agnes 3.0 Flash2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Agnes 3.0 Flash1 of 1 test
Long documents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Agnes 3.0 Flash pulls ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+70.8points ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+44.4points ahead
- Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+43.7points ahead
Where Celeris-1 pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 13 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingAgnes 3.0 Flash
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Agnes 3.0 Flash by 70.88211.2+70.8
- SciCodeAgnes 3.0 Flash by 3051.621.6+30
AgentsAgnes 3.0 Flash
- GDPValAgnes 3.0 Flash by 52.552.50+52.5
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingAgnes 3.0 Flash by 43.747.63.9+43.7
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Agnes 3.0 Flash by 7.17.10+7.1
ReasoningAgnes 3.0 Flash
- Humanity's Last ExamAgnes 3.0 Flash by 31.738.56.8+31.7
- GPQA DiamondAgnes 3.0 Flash by 29.392.463.1+29.3
- CritPtAgnes 3.0 Flash by 15.115.10+15.1
FactsAgnes 3.0 Flash
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationAgnes 3.0 Flash by 44.451.67.2+44.4
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyAgnes 3.0 Flash by 14.525.511+14.5
Other results2 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceAgnes 3.0 Flash by 61-10.6-71.6+61
- AA IntelligenceAgnes 3.0 Flash by 29.235.56.3+29.2
Questions people ask
Which is better, Agnes 3.0 Flash or Celeris-1?
Agnes 3.0 Flash wins all five areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts and long documents. Celeris-1 wins none.
Which is better for coding?
Agnes 3.0 Flash. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Celeris-1 wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 13 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.