Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Apertus 70B Instruct vs OLMo-2-7B

Swiss AI Initiative · released

Wins 2 of 4 areas

Coding · Following instructions

AllenAI · released

Wins 1 of 4 areas

Reasoning

Apertus 70B Instruct wins more areas, narrowly.OLMo-2-7B is better at reasoning.

Scores updated · 8 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the four areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Apertus 70B Instruct$0.82 to read · $2.92 to write$3.74Price from Artificial Analysis
OLMo-2-7BNo current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Apertus 70B Instruct pulls ahead

  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+2points aheadApertus 70B Instruct5.7OLMo-2-7B3.7
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+1.5points aheadApertus 70B Instruct25.9OLMo-2-7B24.4

Where OLMo-2-7B pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+1.6points aheadOLMo-2-7B28.8Apertus 70B Instruct27.2

Every test, side by side

All 8 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingApertus 70B Instruct

Full coding ranking

ReasoningOLMo-2-7B

Full reasoning ranking

Long documentsEven

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsApertus 70B Instruct
  • IFBenchApertus 70B Instruct by 1.525.924.4+1.5

Full following instructions ranking

Other results2 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Apertus 70B Instruct or OLMo-2-7B?

Apertus 70B Instruct wins two of the four areas where both have results: coding and following instructions. OLMo-2-7B wins reasoning. They are level on long documents.

Which is better for coding?

Apertus 70B Instruct. It wins 1 of the 2 coding tests both models report; OLMo-2-7B wins none, and 1 is a tie.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 8 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 6 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.