Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Apertus 8B Instruct vs OLMo-2-7B

Swiss AI Initiative · released

Wins 0 of 4 areas

—

AllenAI · released

Wins 2 of 4 areas

Reasoning · Following instructions

OLMo-2-7B wins more areas, narrowly.

Scores updated · 8 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the four areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Apertus 8B Instruct$0.10 to read · $0.20 to write$0.30Price from Artificial Analysis
OLMo-2-7BNo current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where OLMo-2-7B pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+3.2points aheadOLMo-2-7B28.8Apertus 8B Instruct25.6
  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+2points aheadOLMo-2-7B24.4Apertus 8B Instruct22.4

Where Apertus 8B Instruct pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 8 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingEven

Full coding ranking

ReasoningOLMo-2-7B

Full reasoning ranking

Long documentsEven

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsOLMo-2-7B

Full following instructions ranking

Other results2 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Apertus 8B Instruct or OLMo-2-7B?

OLMo-2-7B wins two of the four areas where both have results: reasoning and following instructions. Apertus 8B Instruct wins none. They are level on coding and long documents.

Which is better for coding?

Neither. All 2 coding tests both models report are ties.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 8 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 6 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.