Apodex 1.1 vs Claude 5.5
Wins 1 of 5 areas
Long documents
Wins 4 of 5 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts
Claude 5.5 is the stronger all-rounder.Apodex 1.1 is cheaper and better at long documents.
Scores updated · 10 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own02Claude 5.52 of 2 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Claude 5.52 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02Claude 5.52 of 2 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software01Claude 5.51 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Apodex 1.11 of 1 test
Coding and long documents rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Apodex 1.1 costs 73% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude 5.5 pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+27.2points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+15.5points ahead
- Research-level physics problemsCritPt+12.3points ahead
Where Apodex 1.1 pulls ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+3points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 10 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
AgentsClaude 5.5
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Claude 5.5 by 29.8029.8+29.8
- GDPValClaude 5.5 by 6.434.841.2+6.4
ReasoningClaude 5.5
- CritPtClaude 5.5 by 12.34.616.9+12.3
- Humanity's Last ExamClaude 5.5 by 5.734.139.8+5.7
FactsClaude 5.5
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude 5.5 by 27.221.648.8+27.2
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude 5.5 by 15.531.747.2+15.5
Other results2 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude 5.5 by 42-21.920.1+42
- AA IntelligenceClaude 5.5 by 14.426.440.8+14.4
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apodex 1.1 or Claude 5.5?
Claude 5.5 wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning and facts. Apodex 1.1 wins long documents, and costs 73% less.
Which is better for coding?
Claude 5.5. It wins the one coding test both models report.
Which is cheaper?
Apodex 1.1 costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $3.00 per million output tokens; Claude 5.5 costs $2.00 and $10.00. That makes Apodex 1.1 about 73% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 10 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 8 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.