Apodex 1.1 vs G9v3-3B
Wins 4 of 5 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Long documents
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Apodex 1.1 is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 14 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Apodex 1.13 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Apodex 1.12 of 2 tests
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own20Apodex 1.12 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Apodex 1.11 of 1 test
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Apodex 1.1 pulls ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+63.7points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+42.6points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+38points ahead
Where G9v3-3B pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+66.7points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 14 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingApodex 1.1
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Apodex 1.1 by 63.769.76+63.7
- SciCodeApodex 1.1 by 27.845.517.7+27.8
AgentsApodex 1.1
- GDPValApodex 1.1 by 19.434.815.4+19.4
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingApodex 1.1 by 19.425.25.8+19.4
ReasoningApodex 1.1
- GPQA DiamondApodex 1.1 by 42.686.443.8+42.6
- Humanity's Last ExamApodex 1.1 by 29.634.14.5+29.6
- CritPtApodex 1.1 by 4.64.60+4.6
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationG9v3-3B by 66.721.688.3+66.7
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyApodex 1.1 by 25.231.76.5+25.2
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexApodex 1.1 by 50.960.89.9+50.9
- AA Agentic IndexApodex 1.1 by 22.636.614+22.6
- AA-OmniscienceG9v3-3B by 17.5-21.9-4.4+17.5
- AA IntelligenceApodex 1.1 by 15.626.410.8+15.6
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apodex 1.1 or G9v3-3B?
Apodex 1.1 wins four of the five areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning and long documents. G9v3-3B wins none. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
Apodex 1.1. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; G9v3-3B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 14 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.