Apodex 1.1 vs K2 Horizon 7B
Wins 3 of 5 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Long documents
Wins 1 of 5 areas
Agents
Apodex 1.1 is the stronger all-rounder.K2 Horizon 7B is better at agents.
Scores updated · 13 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking30Apodex 1.13 of 3 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Apodex 1.12 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Apodex 1.11 of 1 test
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own12K2 Horizon 7B2 of 3 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Apodex 1.1 pulls ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+25.5points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+18.9points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+18points ahead
Where K2 Horizon 7B pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+44.8points ahead
- Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+2.4points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 13 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingApodex 1.1
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Apodex 1.1 by 25.569.744.2+25.5
- SciCodeApodex 1.1 by 1845.527.5+18
AgentsK2 Horizon 7B
- GDPValApodex 1.1 by 8.634.826.2+8.6
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingK2 Horizon 7B by 2.425.227.6+2.4
- Terminal-Bench 4.0K2 Horizon 7B by 101+1
ReasoningApodex 1.1
- Humanity's Last ExamApodex 1.1 by 15.934.118.2+15.9
- GPQA DiamondApodex 1.1 by 11.186.475.3+11.1
- CritPtApodex 1.1 by 4.34.60.3+4.3
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationK2 Horizon 7B by 44.821.666.4+44.8
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyApodex 1.1 by 18.931.712.8+18.9
Other results2 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA IntelligenceApodex 1.1 by 5.826.420.6+5.8
- AA-OmniscienceK2 Horizon 7B by 5.3-21.9-16.6+5.3
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apodex 1.1 or K2 Horizon 7B?
Apodex 1.1 wins three of the five areas where both have results: coding, reasoning and long documents. K2 Horizon 7B wins agents. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
Apodex 1.1. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; K2 Horizon 7B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 13 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 11 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.