The two are evenly matched.Apodex 1.1 is better at long documents; Motif-3-Beta at reasoning.
Scores updated · 14 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Motif-3-Beta2 of 3 tests · 1 tie
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Apodex 1.11 of 1 test
- CodingWriting and fixing software11Even1 each
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own11Even1 each
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Motif-3-Beta pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+29.3points ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+6.3points ahead
- Customer-service tasks in a simulated bankτ-Bench V3 · Banking+3.7points ahead
Where Apodex 1.1 pulls ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+10.7points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+4.6points ahead
- Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+4.5points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 14 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingEven
- SciCodeApodex 1.1 by 1.245.544.3+1.2
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Motif-3-Beta by 1.169.770.8+1.1
AgentsEven
- GDPValApodex 1.1 by 4.534.830.3+4.5
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingMotif-3-Beta by 3.725.228.9+3.7
ReasoningMotif-3-Beta
- Humanity's Last ExamMotif-3-Beta by 6.334.140.4+6.3
- CritPtMotif-3-Beta by 1.44.66+1.4
- GPQA Diamondtie86.486.9tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationMotif-3-Beta by 29.321.650.9+29.3
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyApodex 1.1 by 10.731.721+10.7
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA IntelligenceMotif-3-Beta by 5.926.432.3+5.9
- AA-OmniscienceMotif-3-Beta by 4.1-21.9-17.8+4.1
- AA Agentic IndexApodex 1.1 by 1.736.634.9+1.7
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexMotif-3-Beta by 1.260.862+1.2
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apodex 1.1 or Motif-3-Beta?
Apodex 1.1 and Motif-3-Beta each win one of the five areas where both have results. Apodex 1.1 wins long documents; Motif-3-Beta wins reasoning. They are level on coding, agents and facts.
Which is better for coding?
Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 2 both models report.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 14 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.