Apodex 1.1 wins more areas, narrowly.
Scores updated · 14 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own20Apodex 1.12 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Apodex 1.11 of 1 test
- CodingWriting and fixing software11Even1 each
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking11Even1 each · 1 tie
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up11Even1 each
Long documents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The three tests each model wins by the widest margin. Scores are out of 100.
Where Apodex 1.1 pulls ahead
- Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+25.5points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+12.9points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+7.6points ahead
Where Solar Open2 250B pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+53points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+2.5points ahead
- Research-level physics problemsCritPt+1.1points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 14 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingEven
- Terminal-Bench 2.1Apodex 1.1 by 25.569.744.2+25.5
- SciCodeSolar Open2 250B by 2.545.548+2.5
AgentsApodex 1.1
- GDPValApodex 1.1 by 7.234.827.6+7.2
- τ-Bench V3 · BankingApodex 1.1 by 3.625.221.6+3.6
ReasoningEven
- Humanity's Last ExamApodex 1.1 by 5.634.128.5+5.6
- CritPtSolar Open2 250B by 1.14.65.7+1.1
- GPQA Diamondtie86.485.7tie
FactsEven
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationSolar Open2 250B by 5321.674.6+53
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyApodex 1.1 by 12.931.718.8+12.9
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceSolar Open2 250B by 20.1-21.9-1.8+20.1
- Artificial Analysis Coding IndexApodex 1.1 by 15.860.845+15.8
- AA Agentic IndexApodex 1.1 by 8.836.627.8+8.8
- AA IntelligenceApodex 1.1 by 1.726.424.7+1.7
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apodex 1.1 or Solar Open2 250B?
Apodex 1.1 wins two of the five areas where both have results: agents and long documents. Solar Open2 250B wins none. They are level on coding, reasoning and facts.
Which is better for coding?
Neither. They win 1 coding test each of the 2 both models report.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 14 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.