Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker vs OLMo-2-7B
Wins 4 of 4 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 0 of 4 areas
—
Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 8 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the four areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software20Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker2 of 2 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking20Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker2 of 2 tests
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker1 of 1 test
Long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker pulls ahead
- Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+44.7points ahead
- Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+44.5points ahead
- Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+33.6points ahead
Where OLMo-2-7B pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 8 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker
- SciCodeApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 33.637.33.7+33.6
- Terminal-Bench HardApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 14.414.40+14.4
ReasoningApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker
- GPQA DiamondApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 44.573.328.8+44.5
- Humanity's Last ExamApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 5.410.85.4+5.4
Long documentsApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker
- AA-LCRApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 50.350.30+50.3
Following instructionsApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker
- IFBenchApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 44.769.124.4+44.7
Other results2 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 69.369.30+69.3
- AA IntelligenceApriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker by 7.813.45.6+7.8
Questions people ask
Which is better, Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker or OLMo-2-7B?
Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker wins all four areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, long documents and following instructions. OLMo-2-7B wins none.
Which is better for coding?
Apriel-v1.6-15B-Thinker. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; OLMo-2-7B wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 8 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 6 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.