Arctic Instruct is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 11 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Facts rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Every test, side by side
All 11 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
FactsArctic Instruct
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is betterArctic Instruct by 2.64.36.9+2.6
Other results10 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- vectara_answer_rateCommand R+ (Apr '24) by 32.362.795+32.3
- MATHArctic Instruct by 11.651.940.3+11.6
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthCommand R+ (Apr '24) by 10.181.491.5+10.1
- NarrativeQACommand R+ (Apr '24) by 8.165.373.5+8.1
- GSM8KArctic Instruct by 6.176.870.7+6.1
- naturalquestions_closedbookArctic Instruct by 4.73934.3+4.7
- vectara_factual_consistencyArctic Instruct by 2.695.793.1+2.6
- MMLUCommand R+ (Apr '24) by 1.557.559+1.5
- AA Intelligencetie5.45.3tie
- OpenBookQAtie82.882.8tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Arctic Instruct or Command R+ (Apr '24)?
Arctic Instruct wins the one area where both have results: facts. Command R+ (Apr '24) wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 11 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 1 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 10 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.