Arctic Instruct is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 11 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the one area where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Facts rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Every test, side by side
All 11 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
FactsArctic Instruct
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is betterArctic Instruct by 5.34.39.6+5.3
Other results10 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- MATHGPT-4o by 33.451.985.3+33.4
- vectara_answer_rateGPT-4o by 31.162.793.8+31.1
- MMLUGPT-4o by 16.357.573.8+16.3
- GSM8KGPT-4o by 14.176.890.9+14.1
- NarrativeQAGPT-4o by 14.165.379.5+14.1
- OpenBookQAGPT-4o by 1482.896.8+14
- naturalquestions_closedbookGPT-4o by 10.63949.6+10.6
- vectara_factual_consistencyArctic Instruct by 5.395.790.4+5.3
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthGPT-4o by 5.281.486.6+5.2
- AA IntelligenceGPT-4o by 1.95.47.3+1.9
Questions people ask
Which is better, Arctic Instruct or GPT-4o?
Arctic Instruct wins the one area where both have results: facts. GPT-4o wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 11 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 1 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 10 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.