Celeris-1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
Wins 0 of 5 areas
—
Wins 5 of 5 areas
Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) is the stronger all-rounder.Celeris-1 is cheaper.
Scores updated · 10 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- AgentsCarrying out multi-step tasks on its own02Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)2 of 2 tests
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking02Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)2 of 2 tests
- FactsGetting facts right instead of making them up02Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)2 of 2 tests
- CodingWriting and fixing software01Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts01Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)1 of 1 test
Coding and long documents rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Celeris-1 costs 93% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) pulls ahead
- Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+42.6points ahead
- Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+38points ahead
- Answers hard knowledge questions correctlyAA-Omniscience · Accuracy+35.3points ahead
Where Celeris-1 pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 10 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
- SciCodeClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 27.521.649.1+27.5
AgentsClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
- GDPValClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 33.9033.9+33.9
- Terminal-Bench 4.0Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 20.7020.7+20.7
ReasoningClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
- Humanity's Last ExamClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 29.46.836.2+29.4
- CritPtClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 11.4011.4+11.4
FactsClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
- AA-Omniscience · Non-hallucinationClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 42.67.249.8+42.6
- AA-Omniscience · AccuracyClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 35.31146.3+35.3
Long documentsClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)
- AA-LCRClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 383876+38
Other results2 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- AA-OmniscienceClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 91-71.619.4+91
- AA IntelligenceClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) by 29.66.335.9+29.6
Questions people ask
Which is better, Celeris-1 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback)?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) wins all five areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts and long documents. Celeris-1 wins none, but costs 93% less.
Which is better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback). It wins the one coding test both models report.
Which is cheaper?
Celeris-1 costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Low Effort, Default Fallback) costs $2.00 and $10.00. That makes Celeris-1 about 93% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 10 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 8 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.