Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1
Wins 3 of 4 areas
Coding · Long documents · Following instructions
Wins 1 of 4 areas
Reasoning
Claude 3.5 Haiku is the stronger all-rounder.Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1 is better at reasoning.
Scores updated · 7 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the four areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
- CodingWriting and fixing software10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- Long documentsFinding answers in very long texts10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- Following instructionsDoing exactly what it is asked10Claude 3.5 Haiku1 of 1 test
- ReasoningHard problems that need careful thinking01Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.11 of 2 tests · 1 tie
Coding, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls ahead
Where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1 pulls ahead
- Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+1.6points ahead
Every test, side by side
All 7 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
ReasoningLlama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1
- Humanity's Last ExamLlama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1 by 1.63.65.2+1.6
- GPQA Diamondtie40.840.8tie
Following instructionsClaude 3.5 Haiku
- IFBenchClaude 3.5 Haiku by 17.342.825.5+17.3
Other results2 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- τ²-Bench Telecom (AA run)Claude 3.5 Haiku by 12.924.611.7+12.9
- AA IntelligenceClaude 3.5 Haiku by 1.68.97.3+1.6
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1?
Claude 3.5 Haiku wins three of the four areas where both have results: coding, long documents and following instructions. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1 wins reasoning.
Which is better for coding?
Claude 3.5 Haiku. It wins the one coding test both models report.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 7 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 5 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.