Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Motif-3

Anthropic · released

Wins 0 of 5 areas

—

Motif Technologies · released

Wins 5 of 5 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning · Facts · Long documents

Motif-3 is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 14 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Long documents rests on a single test.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Motif-3 pulls ahead

  • Command-line tasks in a real terminalTerminal-Bench 2.1+64.8points aheadMotif-374.9Claude 3.5 Haiku10.1
  • Reasons across sets of long documentsAA-LCR+48.7points aheadMotif-376Claude 3.5 Haiku27.3
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+42.6points aheadMotif-383.4Claude 3.5 Haiku40.8

Where Claude 3.5 Haiku pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 14 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingMotif-3

Full coding ranking

AgentsMotif-3

Full agents ranking

ReasoningMotif-3

Full reasoning ranking

FactsMotif-3

Full facts ranking

Long documentsMotif-3
  • AA-LCRMotif-3 by 48.727.376+48.7

Full long documents ranking

Other results4 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Motif-3?

Motif-3 wins all five areas where both have results: coding, agents, reasoning, facts and long documents. Claude 3.5 Haiku wins none.

Which is better for coding?

Motif-3. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude 3.5 Haiku wins none.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 14 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 10 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.