Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude 3 Haiku vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1

Anthropic · released

Wins 3 of 4 areas

Coding · Long documents · Following instructions

NVIDIA · released

Wins 1 of 4 areas

Reasoning

Claude 3 Haiku is the stronger all-rounder.Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1 is better at reasoning.

Scores updated · 7 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the four areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Coding, long documents and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude 3 Haiku$0.25 to read · $1.25 to write$1.50Price from Artificial Analysis
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1No current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Claude 3 Haiku pulls ahead

  • Follows unfamiliar, precisely checkable instructionsIFBench+10.6points aheadClaude 3 Haiku36.1Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.125.5
  • Code for real scientific research problemsSciCode+8.5points aheadClaude 3 Haiku18.6Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.110.1

Where Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1 pulls ahead

  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+3.4points aheadLlama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.140.8Claude 3 Haiku37.4
  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+1.1points aheadLlama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.15.2Claude 3 Haiku4.1

Every test, side by side

All 7 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingClaude 3 Haiku
  • SciCodeClaude 3 Haiku by 8.518.610.1+8.5

Full coding ranking

ReasoningLlama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1

Full reasoning ranking

Long documentsClaude 3 Haiku
  • AA-LCRClaude 3 Haiku by 27.727.70+27.7

Full long documents ranking

Following instructionsClaude 3 Haiku
  • IFBenchClaude 3 Haiku by 10.636.125.5+10.6

Full following instructions ranking

Other results2 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1?

Claude 3 Haiku wins three of the four areas where both have results: coding, long documents and following instructions. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 4B V1.1 wins reasoning.

Which is better for coding?

Claude 3 Haiku. It wins the one coding test both models report.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 7 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 5 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.