Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Opus 4 vs GPT-5.1 Instant

Anthropic · released

Wins 1 of 4 areas

Following instructions

OpenAI

Wins 3 of 4 areas

Coding · Reasoning · Images and charts

GPT-5.1 Instant is the stronger all-rounder.Claude Opus 4 is better at following instructions.

Scores updated · 7 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the four areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Coding, reasoning, images and charts and following instructions rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Opus 4$15.00 to read · $75.00 to write$90Price from Anthropic's own price page
GPT-5.1 InstantNo current price is tracked.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where GPT-5.1 Instant pulls ahead

  • College exam questions with charts, maps and diagramsMMMU+11.7points aheadGPT-5.1 Instant85.4Claude Opus 473.7
  • Graduate-level biology, physics and chemistry questionsGPQA Diamond+8.5points aheadGPT-5.1 Instant88.1Claude Opus 479.6
  • Fixes real GitHub issues in Python projectsSWE-bench Verified+3.8points aheadGPT-5.1 Instant76.3Claude Opus 472.5

Where Claude Opus 4 pulls ahead

  • Keeps track of context across a multi-turn chatMulti-Challenge+7.4points aheadClaude Opus 458.6GPT-5.1 Instant51.2

Every test, side by side

All 7 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingGPT-5.1 Instant

Full coding ranking

ReasoningGPT-5.1 Instant

Full reasoning ranking

Images and chartsGPT-5.1 Instant
  • MMMUGPT-5.1 Instant by 11.773.785.4+11.7

Full images and charts ranking

Following instructionsClaude Opus 4

Full following instructions ranking

Other results3 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or GPT-5.1 Instant?

GPT-5.1 Instant wins three of the four areas where both have results: coding, reasoning and images and charts. Claude Opus 4 wins following instructions.

Which is better for coding?

GPT-5.1 Instant. It wins the one coding test both models report.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 7 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.