Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Mythos 5.1 vs Claude Opus 5

Anthropic · released

Wins 2 of 2 areas

Coding · Reasoning

Anthropic · released

Wins 0 of 2 areas

—

Claude Mythos 5.1 is the stronger all-rounder.Claude Opus 5 is cheaper.

Scores updated · 16 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Mythos 5.1$10.00 to read · $50.00 to write$60Price from Anthropic's own price page
Claude Opus 5$5.00 to read · $25.00 to write$30Price from Anthropic's own price page

Claude Opus 5 costs 50% less for the same work.

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Claude Mythos 5.1 pulls ahead

  • Very hard expert questions across many subjectsHumanity's Last Exam+6points aheadClaude Mythos 5.160.9Claude Opus 554.9
  • Long, multi-file coding tasks in real codebasesSWE-bench Pro+2points aheadClaude Mythos 5.181.2Claude Opus 579.2

Where Claude Opus 5 pulls ahead

No clear win on a test scored out of 100.

Every test, side by side

All 16 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingClaude Mythos 5.1

Full coding ranking

ReasoningClaude Mythos 5.1

Full reasoning ranking

Other results12 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1Claude Mythos 5.1 by 23.652.629+23.6
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Claude Mythos 5.1 by 9.160.951.8+9.1
  • SWE-bench MultimodalClaude Opus 5 by 4.754.759.4+4.7
  • GDPval-AA v2Claude Mythos 5.1 by 29 rating points18531824+29 rating
  • OSWorld 2.0 (partial)Claude Mythos 5.1 by 2.577.975.4+2.5
  • HealthBench ProfessionalClaude Mythos 5.1 by 2.362.159.8+2.3
  • Program BenchClaude Mythos 5.1 by 2.287.685.4+2.2
  • OSWorld 2.0 (strict)Claude Mythos 5.1 by 2.141.739.6+2.1
  • ProteinGym HardClaude Mythos 5.1 by 1.649.347.7+1.6
  • DeepSWE 1.1Claude Opus 5 by 1.467.468.8+1.4
  • HLE (with tools)Claude Mythos 5.1 by 1.46563.6+1.4
  • ARC-AGI-1tie97.597.5tie

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Mythos 5.1 or Claude Opus 5?

Claude Mythos 5.1 wins all two areas where both have results: coding and reasoning. Claude Opus 5 wins none, but costs 50% less.

Which is better for coding?

Claude Mythos 5.1. It wins 1 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude Opus 5 wins none, and 1 is a tie.

Which is cheaper?

Claude Mythos 5.1 costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; Claude Opus 5 costs $5.00 and $25.00. That makes Claude Opus 5 about 50% cheaper for the same work.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 16 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 12 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.