Claude Opus 4.5 vs Kimi VL A3B Instruct
Wins 2 of 2 areas
Agents · Images and charts
Wins 0 of 2 areas
—
Claude Opus 4.5 is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 5 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the two areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Agents rests on a single test.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude Opus 4.5 pulls ahead
- Completes tasks by operating a computer desktopOSWorld-Verified+58.1points ahead
- Harder college exam questions with imagesMMMU-Pro+38points ahead
- College exam questions with charts, maps and diagramsMMMU+23.7points ahead
Where Kimi VL A3B Instruct pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 5 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Images and chartsClaude Opus 4.5
Other results1 test, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- MATH-VisionClaude Opus 4.5 by 55.777.121.4+55.7
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Kimi VL A3B Instruct?
Claude Opus 4.5 wins all two areas where both have results: agents and images and charts. Kimi VL A3B Instruct wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 5 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 1 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.