Claude Opus 4.6 vs muse-wonder-1.0
Wins 0 of 4 areas
—
Wins 4 of 4 areas
Coding · Reasoning · Math · Following instructions
muse-wonder-1.0 is the stronger all-rounder.
Scores updated · 8 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the four areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Reasoning, math and following instructions rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where muse-wonder-1.0 pulls ahead
- Fixes real GitHub issues, working as an agentLiveBench · Agentic Coding+13.7points ahead
- Follows detailed instructions exactlyLiveBench · Instruction Following+9.7points ahead
- Fresh competition math problemsLiveBench · Mathematics+7.2points ahead
Where Claude Opus 4.6 pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 8 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
Codingmuse-wonder-1.0
- LiveBench · Agentic Codingmuse-wonder-1.0 by 13.74962.7+13.7
- LiveBench · Codingmuse-wonder-1.0 by 2.578.280.7+2.5
Reasoningmuse-wonder-1.0
- LiveBench · Reasoningmuse-wonder-1.0 by 1.988.790.6+1.9
Following instructionsmuse-wonder-1.0
- LiveBench · Instruction Followingmuse-wonder-1.0 by 9.763.373+9.7
Other results3 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- HiL-Bench (Tools-allowed)muse-wonder-1.0 by 41.438.379.7+41.4
- livebench_data_analysismuse-wonder-1.0 by 11.769.981.6+11.7
- livebench_languagetie83.382.9tie
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or muse-wonder-1.0?
muse-wonder-1.0 wins all four areas where both have results: coding, reasoning, math and following instructions. Claude Opus 4.6 wins none.
Which is better for coding?
muse-wonder-1.0. It wins 2 of the 2 coding tests both models report; Claude Opus 4.6 wins none.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 8 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 5 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 3 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.