Claude Opus 4.7 is the stronger all-rounder.Qwen3.5 Flash is cheaper.
Scores updated · 8 tests both models report · How we compare
Where each one wins
Tests won in each of the three areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.
Coding and math rest on a single test each.
What it costs
Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.
Qwen3.5 Flash costs 98% less for the same work.
The biggest differences
The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.
Where Claude Opus 4.7 pulls ahead
- Unpublished advanced math problemsFrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2)+51.9points ahead
- Short factual questions, answered correctlySimpleQA Verified+31.4points ahead
Where Qwen3.5 Flash pulls ahead
No clear win on a test scored out of 100.
Every test, side by side
All 8 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.
CodingClaude Opus 4.7
- LMArena · WebDevClaude Opus 4.7 by 320 rating points15581238+320 rating
FactsEven
- SimpleQA VerifiedClaude Opus 4.7 by 31.451.720.3+31.4
- Vectara HHEM hallucination ratelower is betterQwen3.5 Flash by 1.51210.5+1.5
Other results4 tests, not counted
Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.
- frontiermath_tier_4_v1Claude Opus 4.7 by 22.922.90+22.9
- vectara_avg_summary_lengthClaude Opus 4.7 by 54.1 rating points149.195+54.1 rating
- vectara_answer_rateQwen3.5 Flash by 1.89899.8+1.8
- vectara_factual_consistencyQwen3.5 Flash by 1.58889.5+1.5
Questions people ask
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.5 Flash?
Claude Opus 4.7 wins two of the three areas where both have results: coding and math. Qwen3.5 Flash wins none, but costs 98% less. They are level on facts.
Which is better for coding?
Claude Opus 4.7. It wins the one coding test both models report.
Which is cheaper?
Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $25.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Flash costs $0.10 and $0.40. That makes Qwen3.5 Flash about 98% cheaper for the same work.
How do you compare the two?
We use the 8 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 4 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 4 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.