Claude Opus 4.8 vs MiMo V2.6 Pro
19 SHARED BENCHMARKSAcross 19 shared benchmarks, Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on 6 and MiMo V2.6 Pro on 13. The widest gap is AA-Omniscience, where Claude Opus 4.8 scores 28.8 against 8.4. MiMo V2.6 Pro is the cheaper of the two on tracked API pricing ($0.43 against $5.00 per million input tokens).
At a glance
Release dates per Artificial Analysis. Prices: Artificial Analysis for Claude Opus 4.8; Artificial Analysis for MiMo V2.6 Pro. ◆ = independently verified score.
Where each leadsby capability area · benchmark wins
Biggest gaps
Claude Opus 4.8 pulls furthest ahead on
- AA-Omniscience · Accuracy48.8 vs 34.9
Every shared benchmark19 · grouped by area
Reasoning 2
Coding 2
Agentic 3
Factuality 2
Long Context 1
Other shared benchmarks 9
Each score is the one the model's own page shows — the most authoritative tracked result for that benchmark, on the benchmark's standard methodology (source-attributed). ↓ marks lower-is-better metrics; ◆ an independently verified score. Open either model for its full surface, provenance and pricing. Quoted rates are the price-setter row we currently track for each model — its direct or vendor-official listing where one exists (direct, direct), otherwise the lowest tracked offer.