Skip to content
VECTOR WIREAI INTELLIGENCE
UTC

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)

Anthropic · released

Wins 0 of 5 areas

—

Anthropic · released

Wins 3 of 5 areas

Coding · Agents · Reasoning

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) is the stronger all-rounder.

Scores updated · 10 tests both models report · How we compare

Where each one wins

Tests won in each of the five areas where both have results. Each piece is one test, so a longer bar means more evidence; grey means the two scored within a point of each other.

Coding and long documents rest on a single test each.

What it costs

Prices per million tokens, roughly 750,000 words. The bars show the cost of a million tokens read plus a million written.

Claude Sonnet 5$2.00 to read · $10.00 to write$12Price from Anthropic's own price page
Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)$2.00 to read · $10.00 to write$12Price from Artificial Analysis

The biggest differences

The tests each model wins by the widest margin, up to three each. Scores are out of 100.

Where Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) pulls ahead

  • Complex command-line tasks across many fieldsTerminal-Bench 4.0+49.5points aheadClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)63.6Claude Sonnet 514.1
  • Real work tasks from 44 professionsGDPVal+18.7points aheadClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)67Claude Sonnet 548.3
  • Research-level physics problemsCritPt+14.5points aheadClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)31.4Claude Sonnet 516.9

Where Claude Sonnet 5 pulls ahead

  • Avoids making up answers it doesn't knowAA-Omniscience · Non-hallucination+7.6points aheadClaude Sonnet 560.6Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)53

Every test, side by side

All 10 tests both models report. The winning score is in its model's colour; marks a score checked independently.

CodingClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
  • SciCodeClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) by 6.754.361+6.7

Full coding ranking

AgentsClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
  • Terminal-Bench 4.0Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) by 49.514.163.6+49.5
  • GDPValClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) by 18.748.367+18.7

Full agents ranking

ReasoningClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)
  • CritPtClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) by 14.516.931.4+14.5
  • Humanity's Last ExamClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) by 13.741.355+13.7

Full reasoning ranking

FactsEven

Full facts ranking

Long documentsEven

Full long documents ranking

Other results2 tests, not counted

Tests outside the eight areas. They are not counted above: several are summary scores built from other tests, or the same test under another name.

  • AA IntelligenceClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) by 17.838.256+17.8
  • AA-OmniscienceClaude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) by 15.816.432.3+15.8

Questions people ask

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 5 or Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback)?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) wins three of the five areas where both have results: coding, agents and reasoning. Claude Sonnet 5 wins none. They are level on facts and long documents.

Which is better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback). It wins the one coding test both models report.

Which is cheaper?

Claude Sonnet 5 costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 5.5 (Adaptive Reasoning, Max Effort, Default Fallback) costs $2.00 and $10.00. For a million tokens read plus a million written, they cost about the same.

How do you compare the two?

We use the 10 benchmark tests both models have published scores on. The verdict counts the 8 tests in the eight capability areas, and a gap under one point (ten on rating-style scales) counts as a tie. The other 2 are listed but not counted, because several are summary scores or repeat a test. Each score is the one shown on the model's own page.